INSTRUMENTS // 

Methodologies

The ICHD, as one of the leading think tanks in Armenia and in South Caucasus provides policy advice on various issues on the national agenda. One of the most effective instruments that ICHD uses to voice voicing public and expert opinions on various critical economic, political, social and educational issues are Off-the-Record discussions (OTRs) followed by its "Policy Papers". Up to date, ICHD has organized over 100 OTRs and produced over 110 policy papers.

The instrument of OTR discussions has already been acknowledged as extremely useful in decision making by many parliamentarians and government officials who keep receiving resulting policy papers after each OTR. The ICHD monitors the get feedback on various policy briefs developed and distributed. Both the quantity and quality of the feedback has significantly increased in recent years, as online data such as e-mails and offline subsequent discussions prove. In 2007 ICHD started its blog at http://blog.ichd.org, which has been used as a feedback platform ever since. The feedback is being provided not only by decision makers, but also by other experts and the wider public, which shows the active interest in policy discussion.

Another important instrument used by the Center is the Town Hall Meeting mechanism, one of the most effective models of facilitating public participation in decision making process in local communities. Town Hall Meeting creates meaningful opportunities for citizens to participate in public decision making. This unique process is based on the experience of the organization "America Speaks", which developed the methodology of town hall meetings to address the needs of citizens, decision makers and democracy.

Decision makers often find it difficult to gauge how the majority of "general interest" citizens feel about important issues. In turn, citizens feel disregarded and less inclined to participate in public life, creating a dangerous cycle. The THM process restores the citizens' voice in public decision making by creating an opportunity for the general public to give those in leadership positions direct, substantive feedback on key public issues. Each meeting effectively restores the balance of the "political playing field" by engaging hundreds of "general interest" citizens at a time, effectively and quickly summarizing citizen input and widely disseminating the results through media coverage. The strengths of the THM model, in particular include: (a) scaling up; (b) everyone participates; no idea is lost; (c) iterative discussions; (d) clear articulation of priorities. The critical success factors of the mechanism include: (a) every voice is at the tables; (b) decision-makers involved at each step; (c) right content, structure, and process; (d) outcomes that make a difference.

Town Hall Meeting focuses on discussion and deliberation among citizens rather than speeches, Q&A sessions or panel presentations. Technology transforms the individual table discussions into one large group discussion. Each table submits recommendations and ideas using wireless groupware computers. At each table there is a note-taker who records all the ideas exchanged around the table and submits to the head operator who moderates the incoming messages to display for public attention. At the end of the discussions each participant can vote on specific proposals using polling keypads/computer program. The entire group responds to the themes generated from table discussions and votes on their final recommendations to decision makers. Before the meeting ends, final recommendations are compiled into a report, which is distributed to participants, decision makers and the media. Decision makers actively engage in the meeting by participating in table discussions, observing the process and responding to citizen input at the end of the meeting.

The ICHD also has vast experience in creating, developing and transforming various networks including communities of practice. One of the key networks created by the ICHD is the MOMENTUM network of professionals trained in facilitation and negotiation skills. The network provides an extensive pool of highly qualified facilitators and operators of the THM mechanism.

NEWS

11.04.2017

Conducting Qualitative Research on Domestic Violence in Armenia (CQRDVA)

Violence against women is one of the worst forms of violation of human rights prevalent all over the world. Women face gender-based violence (GBV) in workplaces, educational institutions, rural and urban communities. They are exposed to GBV irrespective of their ethnic or religious background, social status, economic standing, age, or other condition. The violence is particularly rampant when it occurs at home, a place where women are supposed to be provided with safe family environment.

 more >>
17.02.2017

Monitoring of Online Print Media on Sex Selection in Armenia

The current policy brief aimed at analyzing the monitored online print media outlets in cases when they covered the topic of sex selection and articles that were broadly linked to the value of girls and women. The content of web-based media outlets have been scrutinized to identify any statements or reporting that could have had distorted, untruthful or prejudicial elements against women or men. All these aspects were separately analyzed quantified and also handpicked, allowing analyzing the level of stereotypical reporting either as a media intention or as an absence of intention, leading to unobstructed penetration of prejudicial statements widely circulated in the society and back by reinstating the current state of the affairs.

 more >>
24.08.2016

Cases

The publication is available only in Armenian.

LATEST PUBLICATIONS

06.03.2017

Monitoring of Online Print Media on Sex Selection in Armenia

The current policy brief aimed at analyzing the monitored online print media outlets in cases when they covered the topic of sex selection and articles that were broadly linked to the value of girls and women. The content of web-based media outlets have been scrutinized to identify any statements or reporting that could have had distorted, untruthful or prejudicial elements against women or men. All these aspects were separately analyzed quantified and also handpicked, allowing analyzing the level of stereotypical reporting either as a media intention or as an absence of intention, leading to unobstructed penetration of prejudicial statements widely circulated in the society and back by reinstating the current state of the affairs. 

The findings that are discussed in the report, show the strong and weak points of media outlets under consideration and suggest policy actions to make sure that unintentional framing at the detriment of any of the social groups does not penetrate the news media and provide opportunities for all stakeholders to deliberate topics of public concern in the most accurate and credible ways possible.