Relevant state agencies and migration experts answer this question without any hesitation: yes. Taking into account both the internal social realities and tendencies, as well as external, i.e. international developments of the employment market, and the requirements of various conventions to which Armenia has joined (International Labor Organization, Convention No. 97; European Social Charter of the Council of Europe) this sphere should be regulated by the state.
Thus, there is a unanimous agreement in principle regarding the issue. However, the key issue is the following: how to regulate the sphere? What pool of tools should be used?
The milestone of the bill on regulation of labor migration drafted by the Migration Agency of the RA Ministry of Territorial Administration (MA MTA) is providing real guarantees for protecting rights and interests of labor migrants.
The special feature of labor migration is the fact that the regulation of the issue is sometimes transferred to the framework of responsibilities of the country providing employment, which results in increasing the necessity of initiating preventive measures in the country exporting labor force. Therefore, it is necessary to
Finding a job in foreign countries entails a range of risks. In order to prevent instances of defective service provision and deception it is suggested to use the following pool of tools:
Introduction of licensing is perhaps the only concept which may meet serious resistance. Opponents believe that it will take the country a step back from liberalization of the economy and economic relations. Given the Armenian reality, there is a serious concern that this tool will spur a number of negative phenomena, specifically corruption, boosting of shadow activities in the field and rise of service prices. The risk of corruption has always existed in a citizen-state official interaction. However, were this a key factor in decision making, there should not have been any kind of licensing practice in Armenia.
Still, the international practice shows that licensing is the most frequently used and effective mechanism among all the other tools mentioned above, which allows preventing violation of citizens' rights and interests.
What can be done? It seems that in the given situation the best option is to accept the concept of licensing and in parallel seek for solutions which will minimize possible negative consequences of introducing this practice. Certainly in terms of liberalization of the economy one can agree with the argument that the more spheres are freed from the "claws" of licensing, the better economic results will be achieved. However, the shift of human resources should not be compared with gaining profits from the export of shoes. While making a decision one should weigh the risks of introducing licensing on one hand and the rights and interests of the citizens on the other. Such a comparison will show that the scale with the protection of citizens' rights and interests weighs significantly heavier, since cases of largescale violation of these rights are numerous.
Adversaries to the concept of licensing claim that licensing is a tool for state officials to unilaterally pursue their owns interests. Without focusing on any counterarguments, it should be noted that licensing can also provide advantageous conditions for entrepreneurs: with the support of the state institutions the relevant agency will provide information regarding job vacancies in foreign countries, as well as data on migration to the mediatory organizations, thus establishing an effective ground for the organization of employment. The Russian proverb says, "The devil (i.e licensing) is not so black as he is painted".
While discussing the rise in prices, let's ask one question: "What would you prefer: to pay more and use a high quality service with guarantees, or pay comparatively less and get no service at all?" Even if licensing results in emergence of shadow practices, those still using these "available" services should be aware that they carry the sole responsibility for protection of their rights.
Licensing will not only hold private organizations accountable, but will also commit them to certain financial responsibilities. Of course, the current practice of providing statistical data can also be considered a mode of accountability; however, in this case the state does not possess any direct leverage to hold accountable those organizations which do not meet the demands for protection of citizens' rights and interests.
Indeed, there is a need to answer another question: what additional skills and capacities should mediatory organizations possess? It is assumed that new issues will emerge if these organizations offer employment opportunities abroad to citizens of their own country, which will be defined by factors, such as immigration laws of the given foreign country, professional exams, travel, lodging, acquiring employment permit, organization of the return and number of other essential factors.
Eventually, one needs to accept that licensing is one of the tools used to regulate relations in the sphere of migration; however, one should also remember that it is not the final goal of adopting the bill.
This paper has been developed based on the opinions passed by the participants of the discussion organized within the framework of the project "Support to Migration Policy Development and Relevant Capacity Building in Armenia". The event took place on July 3, 2007. The project is financed by the European Union.
On January 30, 2024 ICHD organized the first Town Hall Meeting within ACE in Vayk consolidated community, comprising 17 rural and urban settlements, in close collaboration with the local government, "Solution Hub" NGO and their beneficiaries, active young people from the community. The results are summarized in the THM report available in Armenian only.
more >>The Publication is available only in Armenian.
more >>On January 30, 2024 ICHD organized the first Town Hall Meeting within ACE in Vayk consolidated community, comprising 17 rural and urban settlements, in close collaboration with the local government, "Solution Hub" NGO and their beneficiaries, active young people from the community. The results are summarized in the THM report available in Armenian only.